| High Island is an unincorporated community
on the Bolivar Peninsula Northeast of Galveston Island. It gets its name
from the fact that it's located above a salt dome, causing a mound that
rises about 38 feet above the rest of Bolivar Peninsula. This makes
it the highest point on the Gulf Coast, between Alabama and the Yucatán
Peninsula. The term "island" is a figure of speech used to describe
this and other Gulf Coast salt domes.
The High Island dome has been an important geological formation throughout the history of the Gulf Coast. Artifacts found on Bolivar Peninsula indicate hunter gatherers roamed the region for thousands of years, collecting shellfish and hunting the abundant wildlife. These Native Americans may have also visited the mineral springs which used to exist on High Island. These springs resulted from salt dome minerals mixing with groundwater. The mineral springs were an attraction to visitors in the late 1800s. Water from the springs was bottled and sold widely in Texas as an elixir. According to legend, the pirate Jean Lafitte and his crew had parties in the big grove of oak trees that covered the island when they cruised the coast in the early 1800s. He is reputed to have buried treasure here, but so far there's no evidence to support this folklore. Crowds of birdwatchers come to High Island during the spring migration when the beaches and woods of High Island are sometimes covered with birds migrating back to the U.S. from wintering in Central and South America. These occasions are caused by strong, turbulent headwinds and rain that usually happen when a strong, fast-moving cold front crosses the Texas coast and moves into the Gulf of Mexico. The wind and rain slows the migrating birds causing them to rapidly use up their reserves. This means the need to land and rest at the first opportunity after the exhausting flight across the Gulf. As a result the Audubon Society has several bird sanctuaries here. Formation of Salt DomesSalt deposits form when the sea rises and then recedes,
trapping seawater in inland basins/bowls/lakes. Since the water
cannot flow out of these bowls (or flows out very slowly) it evaporates,
leaving the salt. Over time this happens again and again causing
thick beds of salt to build up. Then more millions of years pass and
these beds of salt become covered by layers/strata of rocks and soil.
The High Island salt bed begins six miles underground, but salt is lighter
Since the maximum height of the bump at High Island is slight, it isn't a dramatic rise on the horizon. If coming from Galveston, when you reach N 29° 32.409 W 094° 24.896, look off to your left and you will see an area that's a slightly different elevation than the surrounding area -- that's High Island.
As the salt dome pushes up it tends to the tear different strata apart, creating voids for oil to pool. Thus, oil wells are often drilled around the perimeter of the domes. Oil Field Road rings High Island in a rough circle where wells have been drilled. Because of the nature of the area and the gentle rise of the earth it's difficult to see the mound that is High Island. To claim your find email me the answers to these questions (please don't put the answers in your log):
Please do not post pictures that include the sign.
|
The exchange with the approver went like this:
It's best to start at the bottom and go up, so you read in chorological order
| This log was posted on April 5th. It was my
last, the reviewer never responded. I realize it's argumentative.
I had tried to stay away from this until it looked like all other hope was
lost. It seemed clear if this didn't work, all hope of approval was
lost.
By this time I had spent most of a day and a half constructing the cache page and replying to the approver plus half a day and $100 on a trip to High Island, so I had decided if it wasn't approved this would be my last attempt at an Earthcache, and there was nothing left to lose. For some reason the reviewer encrypted this log, so I had to decrypt and reconstruct it. April 5 by Thot (1307 found) > Your second set of question is much improved over the first. #2 and #4 are good. I've seen no requirement stated for a minimum number of questions. I think I ran across an earthcache that asked only one question, but that was a couple or three weeks ago and I wouldn't be able to find it again. If we now have two acceptable questions, aren't two enough? > The distance [questions] can be found by using a simple mapping program. I hate to be argumentative about this but many, if not most Earthcaches can be solved using simple Google searches. To test this I tried six local earthcaches. I solved three outright (Long Point Fault, Humble's Artesian Well, & Oil's Well That Ends Well). I could also answer the questions on [another] except for one question about what’s on a sign. In fact one of the questions suggests using the web to answer it. Another question asks for dimensions, which as you say, "could be found using a simple mapping program." I feel sure I could have done other local Earthcaches this way but, having proved the point to my satisfaction, I quit. The two I tried and couldn’t solve using the web were ones that asked for information from signs. If it's required that some aspect of the geological formation be visible and that more than two questions are required, these constraints should be stated in the requirements.
|
|
Thot, I posted it for a few of the other Earthcache reviewers to look at. With the following notes. The earthcache program is about teaching people about the earth. Logging requirements that are not realated do not teach the people about the location and the earth science of the area. Your writeup is one of the best that I have seen, however when the person pulls up the questions, (which is what most geocachers do first), they realize that all they need to gather is the information that is gathered for any virtual, and ignore the earth science. Though many were listed in the past, the current standard is that the questions need to relate to the science of the area. The best kind of logging task is one that asks a visitor to go to your coordinates and make a specific observation of a specific, unique geologic feature. And then the visitor is asked to make some kind of interpretation, inference, prediction, etc., based on their own personal observations or measurements. It is best to avoid simple measurements that do not involve further thought or interpretation, such as “measure the height” or “estimate the volume” or “count the number of”. Alone, those questions do not help educate people about the earth. A better example would be something like “Describe the size and depth of these fossil dinosaur footprints. Then estimate what type of dinosaur it was and what it might have been doing when it made these footprints. Explain what observations lead you to this conclusion.” Note, this is just a general example to show how we like to get people thinking. It is not extremely important that visitors determine an exact fact. What is important is that they learn some interesting geologic concepts and think about their earth! (It is also best if the question can help show that the person really did find the correct location, without the use of photographs, which can no longer be required.). Your second set of question is much improved over the first. #2 and #4 are good. The distance ones can be found by using a simple mapping program. Geoawareusa2 March 30 by
Thot (1307 found) March 28 by
geoawareUSA2 |